الإمام القارئ المفر أبو بكر النقاش بين الجرح و التعديل

Abstract EN

People differed about Imam Abu Baker al-Naqash by placing him on disgrace and amendment evaluation.

There were some who weakened him and even more by accusing him of denial, mendacity and inferiority.

Among the famous knowledgeable persons who supported the above were: Al-Khateeb Al-Baghdadi, Ibn Askar and Mohammed Bin Jaafer Al-Shahid on one hand and what was stated by Al-Imam Al-Thahabi on the other hand makes the matter confused and mixed between weakness and documentation.

In the readings aspect, I found that the two genius Imamas, Al-Dani and Ibn Al-Jezri approved him and also made him as a supporter that can be depends upon in this issue particularly when he was one of the most important methods of publication and (Shatibiya which is a poetic system that specializes in the science of readings), whereas the matter is not related to his options which were approved and selected by Al-Dani in (Al-Tayseer) and also not in the method of monitoring and performing the reading but rather in the Quranic originality of such reading whereas the person who brought it forward is accused and a suspicious person, so how the public readers and the reciters depends upon the recitation of such suspicious person.

There are some who accused Al-Naqash interpretation that there are calamities therein on the other hand I found that some great interpreters such as Ibn Atiya, Al-Mawerdi and Al-Qurtubi referred to him in their interpretations and even copied from him and depended upon him in many aspects and scattered places.

From all the above mentioned I realized the seriousness of this research when we shed light on Abu Baker al-Naqash and show the final and proper evaluation of him by highlighting his relationship and efforts in the sciences of interpretation and readings.