أثر مضمون الحديث في تقييم الرواة عند أئمة النقد الرجالي من الإمامية

Abstract EN

The imams of men's criticism of the imamiyya scholars have been purifying the hadiths, and identifying the strengths and weaknesses in them, so they exerted their efforts in that, and their scholarly works testify to that.

and despite their extreme accuracy and sincerity in investigating the news of narrators, we find that they often deviate from the well-known and familiar way of judging narrators, which is to look at thei conditions of narrators in terms of their descriptions.

a high knowledge value - according to the testimony of a number of scrutinizing scholars about the ahl al bayt (peace be upon them), and with great praise for them from the imams (peace be upon them).

this led to the emergence of many serious problems that cast their shadows on the hadith heritage that we have, such as the conflict between the assessments of the imams of criticism and the sayings of the ahl al-bayt (peace be upon them) regarding those narrators, as well as their accusation of exaggeration, confusion, lying or exaggeration, and thus fall into disrepair.

their narratives about authenticity and consideration, and other problems, and this was the reason for choosing the topic of research.

the research will shed light on this phenomenon in an attempt to identify the ways that the imams of men's criticism from the imamiyyah took in evaluating these narrators, as well as resolving the contradiction that occurred between the sayings of critics and the sayings of the Ahl Al-Bayt (peace be upon him) about those narrators, and also clarifying the truth of what those narrators were accused of.