حكم قول الصحابي : أمرنا بكذا و نهينا عن كذا : دراسة حديثية أصولية

Abstract EN

This research deals with an important issue that is common in the principles of Jurisprudence and Hadith Terminology.

It is the judgment of Alsahaby's Saying: We were ordered to do or forbidden to do.

It is an important issue that was and is still one of the main causes of the disagreement between scholars.

This research aims to reveal the disagreement in this issue by collecting the scholars' sayings and evidence, and showing their discussions, then prepondering what the evidence requires in it.

The research has adopted the inductive analytical approach.

It consists of an introduction, four sections and a conclusion.

In the first section, I discussed the words of moods and some of their examples.

The second section shows the reason why Alsahaby did not declare the referring to the Prophet, may Allah bless and peace be upon him.

In the third section, which is the largest of them, I reviewed the sayings of the scholars' evidences and discussion of the issue.

The fourth section includes prepondering what appeared to me was the preponderance.

The conclusion includes the results of the research and the most important points like, the preponderance of the doctrine stating that the companion saying.

We were ordered to do or forbidden to do has the judgment on referring to the Prophet - may Allah bless and peace be upon him.

The researcher has recommended conducting further study by collecting the works dealt in it ,and showing the effect of this difference on the branches of jurisprudence