حق الموظف العام في مناقشة رئيسه في ضوء نمط القيادة الإدارية الرشيدة: دراسة مقارنة بالنظام الإداري في الإسلام

Abstract EN

The discussion of the subordinate to his boss In the scope of the public position is considered legally and systemically from many aspects, the most important of which is: it is a means to the correct opinion, and opening channels of dialogue between the boss and the subordinate In the interest of the work, and as a result it is not permissible for the public employee to deviate from the requirements of the job duty by claiming advice except within the framework of what Is required by the systems and laws of rules and controls.

in this regard, the research was divided into four topics: in which it dealt with: administrative leadership and its role In deepening the principle of mutual respect and meaningful dialogue, the nature of the public employee's commitment to perform the work In the best way, the extent of the legitimacy of the public employee's right to discuss with his boss, a comparative study, and the legal perspective to discuss the subordinate to his boss within the scope of the public office, indicating that the right of the public employee to discuss with his boss according to the values and ethics contained therein, all community relations, not administrative ones, are regulated in his contract, especially if the debater is of experience, sufficiency, accuracy and honesty, without regard to the rank of the field marshal.

the most important search results: 1.

disciplined administrative leadership that has the ability to innovate and innovate is closely related to governance.

rather, it is the key to governance and the measure of its development.

2.

the employee's relationship with his boss is based on adherence to the limits of politeness, decency, and good behavior.

there is no reprimand for a public employee to express his opinion openly in front of his boss.

3.

refraining from public servants criticizing or blaming the government, and disclosing job secrets, within the limits of the system and regulations.

as for the recommendations: the researcher recommends deepening the culture of discussion in the field of public service in the light of what is required by codes of professional behavior in our administrative reality, and what is required by public systems of job duties in consideration of the public interest, and so that social communication tools are not an outlet for undermining the capabilities of homeland security and stability.

especially since there has been evidence that this is a legitimate duty and a national requirement.