توظيف الأدلة الجدلية في تقرير المسائل النحوية و الصرفية : بن جني (ت. 392 هـ.)‎ في كتابه (الخصائص)‎ أنموذجا

Abstract EN

This study is based on shedding light on a type of grammatical evidence, namely, argumentative evidence or arguments, by defining them, and clarifying the difference between them and confirmed scientific evidence (guiding rules), and the impact of their employment in deciding issues, and mentioning examples of their employment in the book (characteristics).

); Ibn Jinni (d.

392 AH.) This study relied on the descriptive analytical method.

It came out with the following results: - Argumentative evidence is characterized as a general logical rationale; It is not concerned with grammatical and morphological issues, but rather applies to more than one chapter in any science.

These evidences share the confirmed scientific evidence (rules of guidance) that they are considered assets, and the latter separates them as being at the core of science.

Grammarists - such as Ibn Jinni (d.

392 AH) and Ibn Al-Anbari (577 AH) - were keen to employ it in their issues; In order to ensure the integrity of the curriculum in grammatical recitation, and to achieve correct standing on grammatical provisions.