انقضاء الدعوى الإدارية لسبق الفصل في موضوعها : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

The judicial ruling arranges basic effects, which are the authoritativeness of the decisive order and its binding executive power, and the authoritativeness of the decisive order means that when the judicial ruling is issued, it is considered an argument in what it was decided by, by putting an end to disputes and preventing the perpetuation of disputes, as the judicial dispute must stop at an end it should not be brought before the judiciary with the same procedure or method by which it was presented, in order to ensure that there is no conflict or contradiction between judicial rulings.

the principle is that the effect of the authority is limited to the litigants in the case in respect of which the judgment was issued and to the same dispute in which a place and reason were decided.

the lawsuit in respect of which the judgment was issued, and in this case it is called the absolute authoritative.

in fact, there is a relationship between the expiration of the case because its subject matter has already been decided and the authority of the matter adjudicated in it, as the means of authentic actions is through the argument that the case is not permissible because it has already been decided.