الرقابة القضائية على منح المخصصات المالية لقوى الامن الداخلي في العراق : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

Judicial oversight is one of the most effective forms of oversight, given the independence and impartiality of the judiciary that enables it to exercise its oversight role and adjudicate disputes away from any external influence in order to achieve justice in litigation before it in order to ensure respect for the principle of legality and the rule of law.

in contrast, this type of oversight makes the administration is keen to perform its work within the limits set by the law so as not to make its actions and actions subject to appeal and cancellation, and then the judiciary discovers its deviation.

in countries that give ordinary courts jurisdiction to consider disputes that occur between individuals or between them and the administration, this is called the unified judicial system.

as for the countries in which the judiciary specializes, the ordinary judiciary decides disputes that occur between individuals or between them and the administration according to the special law, while the administrative judiciary decides disputes.

which is governed by the rules of common law, and this is called the dual judiciary system, and Iraq is considered one of the countries with a dual judiciary there are two specialized judicial bodies, the ordinary judiciary and the administrative judiciary.

in view of the importance of the issue of judicial oversight of administration decisions related to financial allocations for the internal security forces, we have researched this subject within a plan that included two requirements.