نظرية الأدب : إشكالية المفهوم و جدل المعايير

Abstract EN

It seems that research in the field of (literary theory) leads to two successful scenarios.

one of them is subject to the fact that the treatments of (theory) with all the difficulty of acceptance contained in this word are considered (resolved) once and for all.

the course of theoretical history, however, is stigmatized as mere procedural variations that occur within the theoretical framework, which critics mean as a kind of renewal, or a conceptual maneuver in which philosophers are preoccupied, while what must be monitored is the constant behind this diversity to explain a phenomenon as he sees (Strauss).

as for the other, he finds that talking about (theory) falls outside the boundaries of (the need) and that there is a factuality of literature that distances him from the need for a theory as long as the critics have settled on the concept of (universal, great) literature.

such a problem seems fleeting, and obvious at the same time, but it represents a real problem in the modularity of the definition; defining (theory) or (literary), the journey of searching for the boundary, and the factual value of the text since it was based on the concept of "everything has been printed to the categories of formlessness and indeterminacy.