علي الوردي: أفكار ومفاهيم: دراسة تحليلية في كتابه لمحات اجتماعية في تاريخ العراق الحديث

Abstract EN

Never would have got Iraqi thinker the attention like alwardi he got in popular and cultural level.

despite that the writing about him it’s not worthy.

many of them either be a celebratory or general cultural nature.

I want talk about academic lesson level in my opinion or as far as I know.

alwardi did not get enough attention and attempt to deconstruct and analyze views of alwardi in the light of the world and Iraqi situations variant today and do you think alwardi thought left thing or things in light of his reading to the Iraqi personality.

and are back to prove the value of the study questionnaire to know the Iraqi personality after denying for it? in my opinion about al wardi thought its stayed him stuff and things and he still effective to know the Iraqi and Arabic personality and this is what we are trying to confirm it in our search that we think the value of alwardi thought not only in his daring, inspite of the importance of this trait to the thinker and writer.

Alwardi value lies in its manufacture of new concepts.

when we want detect the importance of the writer or what we call him as a thinker, first, we should look for his conceptual product.

second,detect interpretative capacity of this conceptual product today .

third, be sure of the benefit to the researchers who come after him and employed for his conceptual producet as methodolical instrument to knowing Iraqi society trend or any other community.

our striving on this mission that we think it’s one of things that make us treat with alwardi as a thinker we have operated to detect about alwardi philosophical orientations this research comes to complement what we started by.

because the detect about opinion and conceptual producet is a search that it show the philosophical dimension that works on most important concepts and dimension concepts lies in being a conceptual theoretical product and the specialists tries to implement to employ the concept.

so, believe that alwardi ideas stayed closer to induction vision it’s like induction dimension on the other hand it’s like disbelieving method of al poppary.

that put a lot of hypotheses and then pursue its one by one.

most hypotheses resilient to face the criticism is closer to the truth, so we find alwardi stayed three hypotheses he think it’s the most resilient than others.

could this be the theoretical dimension for alwardy hypotheses and his conceptual producer that made him think that he can know the iraqi personality that what made him refuse the statistical questionnaire method to know the Iraqi personality because he suffering from a double profile.

so when something appears in the questionnaire reply and hides things and things.