طبيعة المجلس الدستوري بين الاعتقاد القضائي والحقيقة السياسية

Abstract EN

The aims of this research is to work to determine the nature and professional nature of the political oversight body over the constitutionality of laws, to confirm the validity of its true and accurate description, whether it is a legal or judicial body in terms of its nature and profession according to its specific jurisdiction; Or is it a body of a political nature? Through research, we have confirmed the truth that applies to the validity of its political nature, and this is what negates the validity of describing it as having a legal or judicial nature.

This is through several data and their significance confirms this fact that does not accept any doubt about It is true, as follows: First: by returning to the history and environment of the emergence of the Political Oversight Authority For the first time in human history, its original purpose was not to search for a legal or judicial body, but rather the intention was to search for a political entity to protect the constitution.

Secondly: Logically, the derivation of the name comes from the nature of self-identity, and the name of this body is its being a body.

It is a political and not a legal or judicial body, which confirms its validity And its true political nature.

Third: in terms of the nature of professional jurisdiction under the Constitution of the Origin Environment, out of six constitutional articles, five of them speak about political jurisdiction afor the oversight body.

political, while only one article gives the Commission the right of legal jurisdiction to monitor the constitutionality of laws