قواعد مقاصدية في الموازنة بين الدلالة الظاهرة للنص والقرائن المؤثرة وأثرها في تحقيق الوسطية

Abstract EN

This paper explores five objective-based rules that make students aware of how to weigh overt reading of texts against significant clues to maintain a moderate and balanced stance.

The problem of the study is represented in dealing with two causes of diverging from the overt reading of texts.

The first one is impatience to understand overt meaning that first comes to mind without considering the relevant clues.

The problem is that extremists may stick to these overt senses accusing different approaches as vitiating the overt texts.

Secondly, diverging from the overt reading of texts could be out of slackness and overuse of invalid interpretations.

Therefore, this paper might mitigate this kind of divergence by showing the most important issues that should be considered in context of the overt reading to formulate in short but meaningfully condensed rules.

The descriptive approach is used in this paper including collection of facts and data, comparison, analysis, and interpretation to reach accepted generalizations.