مناهج الأئمة في الاستدلال بالقرآن الكريم

Abstract EN

It is well known that the Noble Qur’an is the pillar, foundation, and foundation of Islamic sharia and to it are its rulings, and it is the origin and source of the sources.

this is a matter in which there is no dispute among Muslim jurists.

however, despite this agreement on the authority of the Qur’an, we find a lot of disagreement among scholars in understanding its meanings, and in the rulings deduced from it.

one of the most important reasons for this difference is; different methods of inference, and methods of deduction, it is known that our imams and scholars have developed a set of rules and principles that control the process of deduction, and there has been a dispute between these scholars in many of these rules, which led to a difference in understanding and deduction.

in this research, i tried to mention some rules related to the semantics of words, and the differences of scholars in each of them, without mentioning the evidence of each group and the responses of the violators.

my purpose is not to give preference between these sayings, but rather the intent of mentioning them is to show the impact of the difference in them on understanding the qur’anic discourse, and how this was reflected in the rulings deduced from it.

through this study, there are matters that should be noted, the most important of which are the following: 1- the interaction of our imams and scholars with texts in general and with the book of God in particular to derive the rulings they contain was based on a set of rules and methods that control it, and was not left to whims and fanaticism as those who have no knowledge think.

2- the understanding of the texts is one of the fruits of the methods followed in this dealing, as the different approaches must lead to different understandings.

3- the difference that occurred among our jurists regarding the inference of the book of God is a significant disagreement, because each of them has proceeded in his ijtihad from recognized scientific foundations, so the one who is right among them has two rewards, and the wrong one has one reward.

may God bless them all and benefit us with their knowledge.

this is what god is pleased with on this subject, and it is only a few of many, so whatever is right in it is from God alone, and whatever was slipping or faulting is from me and from Satan, and praise be to God, lord of the worlds.