التلازم في الاستدلال النحوي : الاستدلال القياسي أنموذجا

Abstract EN

The present research studies grammatical inference to make clear the nature of binding that links parts of inference.

Since in Arabic grammar there are different ways of inferring, the research has chosen the most frequent and popular one, i.e.

analogic inference.

The research presents an account on analogy as concept, its most important parts as put by old and modern grammarians.

Each part of analogy is analyzed to find out the available type of binding.

It has been found that binding in analogic inference is of two types.

The first is subjective binding that expresses the degree of the truthfulness of the inferred.

It is also apparent in cause analogy and similarity since both of them depend on subjective binding to make analogy result certain.

The second is objective binding that expresses the objective relatedness between the introduction and the conclusions.

This relatedness has a degree of validity that extends beyond human credibility, it exists in application analogy, direct analogy if its validity, on which scientists disagree, assumed.

The availability of the two types of analogic inference binding in grammar lesson proves the strength of that analogy that makes it differ from Aristotle's logic with its subjective binding.

Because it has objective binding, it differs from subjective logic.

Dealing with binding necessitates dealing with 'cause' and its two types.

The research has concluded that binding in inference is the cause with which grammarians are kept busy.

This subjective binding in analogic inference, as the research illustrates, is one of the most important causes of dispute among grammarians.