A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles

Joint Authors

Ikeda, kei-ichi
Uchiyama, Yujiro
Omar, Salem
Kakutani, Hiroshi
Imazu, Hiroo
Sumiyama, Kazuki
Tajiri, Hisao
Ang, Tiing Leong
Kaise, Mitsuru

Source

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Issue

Vol. 2009, Issue 2009 (31 Dec. 2009), pp.1-6, 6 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2009-11-17

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

6

Main Subjects

Diseases

Abstract EN

Background and Aims.

There are limited data on the differences in diagnostic yield between 25-gauge and 22-gauge EUS-FNA needles.

This prospective study compared the difference in diagnostic yield between a 22-gauge and a 25-gauge needle when performing EUS-FNA.

Methods.

Forty-three patients with intraluminal or extraluminal mass lesions and/or lymphadenopathy were enrolled prospectively.

EUS-FNA was performed for each mass lesion using both 25- and 22-gauge needles.

The differences in accuracy rate, scoring of needle visibility, ease of puncture and quantity of obtained specimen were evaluated.

Results.

The overall accuracy of 22- and 25-gauge needle was similar at 81% and 76% respectively (N.S).

Likewise the visibility scores of both needles were also similar.

Overall the quantity of specimen obtained higher with the 22-gauge needle (score: 1.64 vs.

P<.001).

However the 25-gauge needle was significantly superior to the 22-gauge needle in terms of ease of puncture (score: 1.9 vs.

1.29, P<.001) and in the quantity of specimen in the context of pancreatic mass EUS-FNA (score: 1.8 vs.

1.58, P<.05).

Conclusion.

The 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles have similar overall diagnostic yield.

The 25-gauge needle appeared superior in the subset of patients with hard lesions and pancreatic masses.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Imazu, Hiroo& Uchiyama, Yujiro& Kakutani, Hiroshi& Ikeda, kei-ichi& Sumiyama, Kazuki& Kaise, Mitsuru…[et al.]. 2009. A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice،Vol. 2009, no. 2009, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-480374

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Imazu, Hiroo…[et al.]. A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice No. 2009 (2009), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-480374

American Medical Association (AMA)

Imazu, Hiroo& Uchiyama, Yujiro& Kakutani, Hiroshi& Ikeda, kei-ichi& Sumiyama, Kazuki& Kaise, Mitsuru…[et al.]. A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2009. Vol. 2009, no. 2009, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-480374

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-480374