A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles
Joint Authors
Ikeda, kei-ichi
Uchiyama, Yujiro
Omar, Salem
Kakutani, Hiroshi
Imazu, Hiroo
Sumiyama, Kazuki
Tajiri, Hisao
Ang, Tiing Leong
Kaise, Mitsuru
Source
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Issue
Vol. 2009, Issue 2009 (31 Dec. 2009), pp.1-6, 6 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2009-11-17
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
6
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Background and Aims.
There are limited data on the differences in diagnostic yield between 25-gauge and 22-gauge EUS-FNA needles.
This prospective study compared the difference in diagnostic yield between a 22-gauge and a 25-gauge needle when performing EUS-FNA.
Methods.
Forty-three patients with intraluminal or extraluminal mass lesions and/or lymphadenopathy were enrolled prospectively.
EUS-FNA was performed for each mass lesion using both 25- and 22-gauge needles.
The differences in accuracy rate, scoring of needle visibility, ease of puncture and quantity of obtained specimen were evaluated.
Results.
The overall accuracy of 22- and 25-gauge needle was similar at 81% and 76% respectively (N.S).
Likewise the visibility scores of both needles were also similar.
Overall the quantity of specimen obtained higher with the 22-gauge needle (score: 1.64 vs.
P<.001).
However the 25-gauge needle was significantly superior to the 22-gauge needle in terms of ease of puncture (score: 1.9 vs.
1.29, P<.001) and in the quantity of specimen in the context of pancreatic mass EUS-FNA (score: 1.8 vs.
1.58, P<.05).
Conclusion.
The 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles have similar overall diagnostic yield.
The 25-gauge needle appeared superior in the subset of patients with hard lesions and pancreatic masses.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Imazu, Hiroo& Uchiyama, Yujiro& Kakutani, Hiroshi& Ikeda, kei-ichi& Sumiyama, Kazuki& Kaise, Mitsuru…[et al.]. 2009. A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice،Vol. 2009, no. 2009, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-480374
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Imazu, Hiroo…[et al.]. A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice No. 2009 (2009), pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-480374
American Medical Association (AMA)
Imazu, Hiroo& Uchiyama, Yujiro& Kakutani, Hiroshi& Ikeda, kei-ichi& Sumiyama, Kazuki& Kaise, Mitsuru…[et al.]. A Prospective Comparison of EUS-Guided FNA Using 25-Gauge and 22-Gauge Needles. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2009. Vol. 2009, no. 2009, pp.1-6.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-480374
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-480374