Comparison of Selected Kinematic Facebows Applied to Mandibular Tracing

Abstract EN

The study focused on the comparison between mechanical and computerized registration methods used by the two selected kinematic facebows.

The material consisted of 35 women aged 18 to 35, studied using the Gerber Dynamic Facebow and the computerized ARCUSdigma II axiograph.

To compare the devices the condylar path inclination (CPI) was recorded according to the Camper’s line, enabling the acquisition of easily comparable values based on which the devices were objectively and subjectively analyzed.

Statistics was performed for the obtained data.

The study showed that the values for the CPI registrated by the ARCUSdigma II are significantly higher than those obtained by using the Gerber Dynamic Facebow.

The significant difference in the records of the CPI is most likely a result of the differences in the registration techniques assumptions.

ARCUSdigma II provides the user with more diagnostic options than Gerber Dynamic Facebow.

Mechanical facebow handling has a higher risk of hand-measuring errors in tracing procedure.

Due to high discrepancy of achieved results from different systems the authors recommend to use articulator compatible with facebow whose measurement has been done.