عموم أسماء الجموع و أثره في اختلاف الفقهاء

Abstract EN

This study aimed to show the opinion of scientists in a sign of the names of the crowds on the whole and its impact on differences of jurists.

Researcher has focused on in the statement meant the names of the crowd, and editing dispute in the pan names of the crowd, the statement correct scholarly view them, and the impact of the dispute in this issue in jurists differences.

The study relied on inductive approach and descriptive approach mainly in addition to the inferential and comparative approach.

The main results of this study that the names of the crowd is : "What was the significance to combine those who make sense, whether definition, or in addition, or reprehensible.

And it shows on the whole in all conditions, has emerged as the impact of otherwise scientists on the issue of pan names crowds in some branches jurisprudential matter of a vow to fast for days, and necessitated the nature of the study that divided the three sections the first of which was about the definition of vocabulary research, and the second from the liberalization of disputable scientists on the issue of pan names of the crowd, and either third topic Offered the models where the impact of doctrinal disagreement scientists across the names of the crowds in different scholars, and ensured the conclusion of the most important results.