موازنة بين الضبط في الرسم المصحفي و الرسم القياسي

Other Title(s)

Comparison between the dabt of the Mushaf and that of nornal orthography

Author

الحمد، غانم قدوري

Source

مجلة البحوث و الدراسات القرآنية : مجلة علمية محكمة متخصصة بالقرآن الكريم و علومه

Publisher

King Fahd Glorious Quran Printing Complex

Publication Date

2009-01-31

Country of Publication

Saudi Arabia

No. of Pages

49

Main Subjects

Islamic Studies

English Abstract

The Uthmanic Orthography at first had no diacritical signs.

The scholars among the tabi ‘in (i.e.

the generation after that of the Prophet's Companions) and those after them felt the necessity of adding sings to indicate the short vowels and to differentiate between letters of the alphabets that are alike in appearance to help the reader to read the Qur'an correctly.

These efforts of theirs led to the creation of a new discipline known as 'the science of dabt'.

The use of the signs in the Mushafic Orthography and the normal Arabic orthography passed through various stages of development and the scholars had different ways of dealing with them.

Consequently, the Mushafic Orthography became distinct with its own signs which are not used in ordinary Arabic writing.

This led to mistakes committed by some readers of the Qur'an.

This Paper is concerned with comparison between the diacritical signs used in the Mushafic Orthography and those used in the normal Orthography used in writings other than the Mushaf with a view to discovering points of agreement and disagreement between them.

And after studying the sources and the mushafs, I have come to the conclusion that there are only five points of disagreement.

Thay are: a) Dotting the final ya'.

b) Symbol of sukun (i.e.

vowellessness of a consonant).

c) The position of the kasrah with regard to the shaddah.

d) The position of the hamzah maksurah vis-a-vis its carrier ya'.

e) The sign of maddah.

I traced and studied the history of the use of these signs in source books and the mushafs, and have discussed the possibility of unifying their use in both the orthographies.

Data Type

Conference Papers

Record ID

BIM-560607

• APA
• MLA
• AMA