الروايات المنتقدة بسبب اختلاف نسخ صحيح البخاري : دراسة تحليلية لانتقادات الإمامين أبي مسعودة الدمشقي، و أبي علي الغساني الجباني

Abstract EN

This research is a study of the disputed narratives that were based on the differences in Saheih Albukhari versions.

The study specializes in the critique of the traditional sayings (hadith) by Imam Aldar Qutni and Abi Masoud al-demashqee.

This critique was illustrated in Alhafiz Ibin Hajer in (Hadi Alsar).

In addition to the concerns that were raised by Abu Ali Algasani Aljaani in his book (Takyeed Almohmal).

He dedicated a chapter to explain the illusions of the Saheih tellers who used critical analysis to draw the full scope of these differences.

The researcher has found the causes of these differences to be attributed to three factors: First, different and controversial versions of the Hadith which leads to having different versions for the same hadith.

Second, Imam Alferberi’s narration about the differences.

Third, the different presentations of the same Hadith given by different tellers.

The study proves that the differences between the tellers of hadith have no effect on the reliability of Saheih Bukhari hadith.

These differences were detected and identified, and their causes were explained by the Hadith scholars.

The study concludes that the existences of these differences serve as an evidence to the truthfulness of the correct collections of the traditional sayings (Hadith) which were the result of the great work by Sunah scholars who used scientific methods in seeking and documenting the differences.