أثر استراتيجي جيكسو و الخرائط المفاهيمية في تحصيل طلبة كلية التربية ابن رشد للعلوم الإنسانية-جامعة بغداد كلية التربية ابن رشد للعوم الإنسانية

Abstract EN

The current research aims to define (strategic effect Gisco and conceptual maps in collecting students of the Faculty of Education at the IbnRushd material of practical education).

1.

There are no statistical differences average degrees of the first experimental set the students who study the strategy of Gisco and average degrees the second the experimental group the students who study the strategyofconceptualmapsatanaverageofofsignificane(0.05).

2.

There are no statistical differencesbetween average degrees of the first experimental set the students who are study ing the strategy of Gisco and the average degrees control group the students who study the usual way at the level of significance (0.05).

3.

There are no statistical differences the average degrees second experimental set who are studying strategy Alkharit conceptual and average scores of the control group of students who are studying in the usual way at the level of significance (0.05) Is determined by current research students of the fourth level in the College of Education, Human Sciences/Ibn Rushd for the academic year 2014/2015 and materialapplications.

Researcher the experimental design chosen a partial seizure and the post test designed for research and which consisted of two sets trials and another officer, also rewarded in chronological age and intelligence variables between groups.

The researcher prepared a test Theselaa final and extracted sincerity and persistence and the coefficient of difficulty and the power of discrimination, and inquired analysis of variance and unilateral way scheffe as a means of statistical data processing.

And come to the superiority of the experimental group first studied strategy Gisco the second group studied the strategy of conceptual maps and the superiority of the experimental group first studied strategy Gisco on disciplinary group that studied the usual way, and the superiority of second experimental group that The control group, who studied in the usual way.