الزيادة على القدر المجزئ من الواجب عند الأصوليين و أثارها الفقهية

Other Title(s)

Exceeding the satisfactory in obligatory duties according to scholars and its jurisprudential effects

Author

الحليبي، فيصل بن سعود بن عبد العزيز

Source

مجلة العلوم الشرعية

Issue

Vol. 2016, Issue 42 (31 Oct. 2016)53 p.

Publisher

Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University Deanship of Scientific Research

Publication Date

2016-10-31

Country of Publication

Saudi Arabia

No. of Pages

53

Main Subjects

Religion
Islamic Studies

Topics

Abstract EN

This topic is of great importance because it is related to two Sharia judgements:The obligatory and therecommended,also because of itssecondary effects which are related to the pillars of Islam.

Contradiction in foundation between jurisprudents and differences in correcting what has been said about secondary issues has added to the importance of allocating independent researchin this subject, and according to the researcher's opinion, reaching the right conclusion.

Obligatory, as estimated and as specified and not specified according to Sharia, is divided into two sections: specified obligatory, which is estimated with a certain amount, and unspecified obligatory; which is not estimated with a certain amount from Sharia.

The excessin the obligatory means the excessin at least what is called obligatory which is not estimated with a certain amount.

Scholars differed in their judgement aboutthis excess: is it obligatory or recommended? There are four opinions on the subject.

First, it is recommended.

Second, it is obligatory.

Third, it depends on certain conditions: if the excess is limited to certain parts then it is not obligatory, otherwise all is obligatory.

Fourth, if the excess is included in the semantic descriptor of the quranic text, then it is obligatory, otherwise it is voluntary.

Each has its legitimate evidence.

The researcher tends on the whole to say that it is recommended, and states his reasons in the content of this research article.

Scholarsalso differed about whether this is a verbal or an essential dispute, and the proper answer is that it isessentialand leads to obligatory dutiesin juriprudence.

I have mentioned ten of these duties.

The difference in correcting narrations originates from the dispute whether the excess is taken into consideration or not; and whether it covers minimal semantic spread of the name or the entirety of it.

Those who hold the first position say that excess is recommended; while the other position sees that it is obligatory.

American Psychological Association (APA)

الحليبي، فيصل بن سعود بن عبد العزيز. 2016. الزيادة على القدر المجزئ من الواجب عند الأصوليين و أثارها الفقهية. مجلة العلوم الشرعية،مج. 2016، ع. 42.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-730106

Modern Language Association (MLA)

الحليبي، فيصل بن سعود بن عبد العزيز. الزيادة على القدر المجزئ من الواجب عند الأصوليين و أثارها الفقهية. مجلة العلوم الشرعية ع. 42 (تشرين الأول 2016).
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-730106

American Medical Association (AMA)

الحليبي، فيصل بن سعود بن عبد العزيز. الزيادة على القدر المجزئ من الواجب عند الأصوليين و أثارها الفقهية. مجلة العلوم الشرعية. 2016. مج. 2016، ع. 42.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-730106

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

يتضمن هوامش.

Record ID

BIM-730106