الاشتراك اللغوي و المعنى السياقي

Author

شندول، محمد

Source

اللسانيات

Publisher

Centre de Recherche Scientifique et Technique pour le Développement de la Langue Arabe

Publication Date

2014-12-31

Country of Publication

Algeria

No. of Pages

29

Main Subjects

Languages & Comparative Literature

English Abstract

The starting point of this study is the assumption of the opposition between homonymy and contextual meaning.

The origin of this opposition lies in the fact that homonymy leads to semantic multiplicity, while rhe contextual meaning concerns monoscmy.

The ability to polysemy raises the problem ot ambiguity of meaning.

This latter leads to the question of how to identify monosemy.

Indeed, the senses which can be considered as evident arc in reality mainly primary senses, which may be accompanicd by ocher variety of significations.

Linguists have proposed methods to identify che significances to be expressed by words able to be polyscmic.

Among these methods, we can mention those which use the context as a means to interpret what agrees in the written form and differs in the sense.

In this paper, we intend to answer the following questions: How can the sens be confused in case of homonymy to form an ambiguous phenomenon in language? How did the lcxicographcrs consider the contextual sense and phenomena of semantic ambiguities? What is the method followed in language dictionaries to decompound the sense of polysemy ? And what is the effect of the chosen method on the article structure of the dictionary ?

French Abstract

La probl&natique dc cct article prend comme point de depart l'hypottvisc de I'oppotition entre I'homonymic et le sens contextual L'originc de cette opposition reside dam le fail quc I'homonymic concernc la multiplicity tfmanriquc.

alors que le sens contcxtucl imircssc la monos^mie.

I.i puuibilite de polysemic soulcve la problcmatsque de I'ambiguitf du sens.

Cette dernicrc crigcndrc a son tour la question dc la mamcrc dc ceriser la momwctnic.

En cffct, les sen* qui peuvent etre considcrei cvidcnts, ne iont cn icalitif quc dc» KM pnmairex.

pouvant etre accompagno d'auiics significations £par$«.

l.es linguisies ont essayc dc proposer des mcthodcs pour cct net ks Significations qu'on 'rut caprimct par les lexemes qui peuvent £tre polyslmiqucs.

Parmi ces mcthodcs.

nous citons cello qui utiliscm le conicxtc comme mojrcn dintcrpretcr ce qui s'accordc dans I'orthographc ct ditfere dans lc sens.

Dans cette communication.

nou» avons I intention de rtpotldre aux questions mivantn: Comment le sens peut-il sc confondtc dans I'homonymic pmir devenir une forme d'ambiguitc dans la langue ' Comment les lexicotogucs ont-ils ion si tie rc lc sens contextud et les formes d'ambiguites seroamiqucs ? Quelle etr la m^thode suivie dans let dictionnaires linguistiqucs pour decomposer la signification dc la polyientic ? Ft quel cat Inflict dc la nW-thodc choisic Mir la structure dc 1'utkk du dictionnairc ?

Data Type

Conference Papers

Record ID

BIM-751330

• APA
• MLA
• AMA