النظام الفيدرالي و أثره على الوحدة المجتمعية : نظرة فقهية معاصرة

Abstract EN

Characterized federal term kind of ambiguity in political studies and therefore did not agree on a statement of the true concept of it, researchers have dealt indicate what it has led this mystery to the multiplicity of viewpoints, but they converge from certain merits, and determine an acceptable form characterized by states image of ethnic and religious diversity multi-leaning policies It could be argued that federalism is a form of government based on the existence of two authorities, one central and other regional connects everyone and anyone Constitution and common interests called for such a system of religious, sectarian and political, social, ethnic and demanded its implementation as a political system leads the country to stability and the imposition of a state of community unity, has ensure that this type of system many advantages helped to resolve many of the communities in which they live a group of sects and creeds problems.

But this kind of an emerging political systems in some countries have faced some sort of legal dispute between the legislators and the people of scientists between permissive and his mind than by the evidence and the arguments in favor of the point of view of each team Although this dispute has left a positive impact can benefit from it in achieving a range of interests and gains that he benefits from the country and the people.

It is that the application of a centralized or decentralized political systems (federal) can be implemented and should not be introduced as soon as applied in some countries, or because of some communities over the status of injustice or aggression regardless of the reasons If the party that wants to decentralized application of the system (Fed) to study the current situation and future feasibility study under the scientific and technical standards and the administrative and territorial socially, politically, economically and combines the words of the people and the contract of scientists, intellectuals, politicians, academics and independent organizers, was in favor of it before work and that while the exclusion was reportedly refused to work under which