مفهوم الجدل بين أفلاطون و أرسطو

Abstract EN

We tried in this study to shed light on the concept of Dialectics when both (Plato and Aristotle), as is the concept of the Dialectics of the important and effective concepts in philosophy and cognitive domain, as was highlighted at the beginning of philosophical thought systematic since its inception with (Zeno of Elea) down to ( Aristotle), the concept of the Dialectics has seen significant abuse when used (sophists)as a means to convince people and the ways contrived that are in line with the fancy of physical and benefits have fired on them that they are or claim to wisdom, and in the context of follow us to the concept of Dialectics when (Plato) and Aristotle we dealt with the most important perceptions have since used Plato controversy for knowledge and access to the realities of things by classifying concepts and divided, and considered too approach that brings the mind of the perceived to reasonable and then get off the mind of highest ideals and down the, as he considered the art of throwing the questions and answers, and then came the turn of (Aristotle), which the latest of many scientific and variables storm in the overall science and the arts, and this is what led to the prosperity of the concept of the Dialectics as a means of training the thinking has been placed among the philosophical concepts by which they can realize the realities of things or accessed in ways evidentiary, and all this cannot be reached without following the laws and mechanisms established by (Aristotle) in his book he called (Tobiqia), as opposed Aristotle In many of( Plato) teacher positions around ConceptDialectics, saying that the Dialectics could not get to, but the stuff without the use of tools on which the Dialectics, such as the definition and the induction and measurement, unlike (Plato), which was adopted on division and separation and so a lot of notes which is set against Plato.