حجية البصمة الوراثية و سلطة المحكمة في الأخذ بها بالإثبات الجزائي : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

This study focuses on in the (D.N.A) as an evidence In proving criminals materials, it has shown the biological sign effect and its role in proving the criminal materials, and then its role to create the judge believes therefore ; this study has been made in tow chapters,intermediate chapter: the type of biological signs and its relation with proving evidences, in the first chapter the biological sign has been limited through its meaning that could reach by using the exact meaning of the sign and biology, accordingly it has been defined as ( a mark that can be sensed and examined where the main source is the human body, and related to one of the human biology actions starting from its anatomy, physiology, or it can be resulted from the normal habits ).

The second chapter discussed the relation between the biological sign with proving evidence, I've made it clear that it’s an indirect and incomplete evidence that needs the usage of extraction and conclusion rules, in addition to other evidence that can be stand by the prove the crime bases and the criminal responsibilities of it.