الحصانة القانونية للشركات الأمنية الخاصة و القانون رقم (52)‎ لسنة 2017

Other Title(s)

Legal immunity of private security companies

Author

المياحي، نبيل عبد شعيبث

Source

مجلة الكوفة للعلوم القانونية و السياسية : مجلة علمية محكمة

Publisher

University of Kufa Faculty of Law

Publication Date

2018-04-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

20

Main Subjects

Law

Topics

• Law
• Privileges and immunities
• Iraq
• Twenty-first century
• Responsibility
• Security companies

English Abstract

No one expects that the concept of privatization, which has grown significantly in all sectors, will be firmly in the field of security, and quickly manifested itself in the emergence of private security companies that have practiced many of the security tasks that were monopolized by government forces.

Private security companies have taken a leading role in managing the interests and interests of States in providing security and protection.

This is an explanation of public-private.

The emergence of these companies on a large scale has not received much opposition from most governments, because they have roots back to a time not near, especially as the societies in those governments have become accustomed to it.

The role played by these companies in the European societies, however, played a major role in Iraq after the occupation of Iraq in 2003 because of the serious violations committed against the Iraqi people, such as the Nisour Square, Abu Ghraib and others.

In addition, the legal immunity granted by the Coalition Provisional Authority under Order No.

(17) for the year 2004 during the exercise of these companies for their functions inside Iraq, has made the Iraqi judiciary unable or unable to prosecute them as security companies Especially over Iraqi law, and thus the use of force, violence and excessive use of the Iraqi people.

More than thirteen (13) years after this legal status, the legislative branch issued Law No.

(52) of 2017 on private security companies, which was expected or contemplated to redress the victims of these companies, but it was completely different The law refers to this, but the Order No.

(17) for the year 2004 has been canceled without the victims and their relatives being given a right to bring the cases before the Iraqi courts with the jurisdiction and jurisdiction to obtain their rights.

Moreover, the state did not bear the legal and legitimate heir of the Coalition Provisional Authority (Dissolved) compensation in order to achieve the count Which guarantees the protection of all people without exception

Data Type

Conference Papers

Record ID

BIM-833293

• APA
• MLA
• AMA