الموقف العقلي لعلماء اللاهوت المعاصرين من إنجيلي مرقس و متى : دراسة تحليلية

Abstract EN

This paper accounts for a number of contemporary rational theologians who are the follower of the top critical school of the Bible.

These theologians have studied thoroughly the Bible especially the evangelical Morks and Matta.

They have found the two biblical texts are contradictory to each other, are not supported by chains of narration, have textual variations, and speculative statements which are not substantiated by proofs.

One wonders: Who wrote the evangelist Morks and when? Are they really from the disciples of Christ or the apostles? Were they merely collected by humans? Was it inspired by the Holy Spirit or was just a human collection? What was the date of books? In which language the two books were written? Hence, the contradictory and different views of the theologians themselves about the credibility of the texts and faith in them.

The paper argues that a sacred text should be preserved by God.

The paper also deals with the views of the traditional and rational theologians of evangelist Mark, and Matthew.