في تطور مفهوم الديمقراطية التوافقية و ملاءمتها لحل الصراعات الطائفية : نموذجا إيرلندا و لبنان

Abstract EN

This paper addresses a theoretical model for the concept of "consociational democracy", beginning with the concept's roots in the Austrian Marxist tradition before describing its elaboration in 1969 by the Dutch-American political scientist Arend Lijphart.

Lijphart's work was part of his wider critique of Gabriel Almond's categorization of Western political systems.

This study presents a structural criticism of the term "consociational democracy" and its usage, arguing that the practice of "consociational democracy" was born of pragmatic policies before maturing into a theoretical model.

It argues that the subsequent contributions of Lijphart were merely an extrapolation from a set of examples without "theory" to underpin it and that "power sharing" does not necessarily lead to democratization.

The study thus draws up several theoretical observations that help distinguish "consociationalism" from "consociational democracy".

Finally, the paper contrasts the suitability of this theoretical model for both Northern Ireland and Lebanon.