فساد الشاهد الشعري النحوي في كتاب (الإنصاف)‎ للأنباري : مسألة القول في أولى العاملين بالعمل في التنازع أنموذجا

Abstract EN

Those who are familiar with Arabic grammar find that poetic evidence has taken its place in citations whether to prove or refute a rule, and they are the basis for creating new rules and eventually they formed a basis for building new rules.

This might be risky since the poetic items of evidence in "Al Insaf’, for example are not compatible with the poetic evidence argumentation standards.

The study is significant as the researcher investigated the syntactic poetic items of evidence in the issue of "the statement for prior judges in argumentations ” in (Al Insaf) and attempts to judge the poetic syntactic items of evidence by applying poetic evidence argumentation standards.

Then justifying why some are not appropriate for argumentation whether in terms of ignorance of the addressee, the multiplicity of the attributive form (al- nisbah), the multiplicity of narration or other reasons.

After investigation, it