أثر الاختلاف في المنهج الأصولي في مسألة الحكم الوارد على خلاف القياس : دراسة تحليلية

Abstract EN

This research presents an analytical study of the impact of difference in fundamentalist curricula in the question of judgment emanating from a similar dimension.

In this article we have exposed the discussion that was conducted by the eminent scholar in Islam Ibn Taymiyya and his pupil Ibn El Kajym on the nomenclature of scholars concerning the judgment emanating from an analogous dimension based on what the legal provisions proved; attempted to project this dispute at the approach of each party to explain its provisions, the dispute was dispelled by determining the significance of the analogy in Ibn Taymiyah and the consensus of scholars, then detailing in Ibn's approach Taymiyya protesting against the opinion "This research was attempted to make an approach between Ibn Taymiyya's approach and that of the consensus of scholars while showing the truth of the conflict, was it verbal or real and if the dispute was in the same point, or was the subject of a total divergence ?