من مسائل الخلاف النحوي : تناوب حروف الجر و العطف على الضمير المخفوض أنموذجا

Abstract EN

T his research discusses one of grammatical disagreement issues (Alteration of preposition and conjunction upon genitive pronoun).

There were lot of grammatical disagreement between Albasra and Alkofa doctrine, on this basis, the researcher chooses two issues which have great disagreement among the grammarian.

Firstly, replace some preposition by another; secondly, the syndetic upon genitive pronoun without repeating the preposition.

The objectives of this research are to present Alkofa and Albasra grammarian opinions, discuss and to preferring the suitable one.

The researcher follows the descriptive and analytical methodology.

Results founded were many, some of them are: Kofian permit alteration of preposition if they are relevant to linguistics rules.

So, they were far from unnecessary affectation and interpretation.

Basra doctrine of forbidden alteration of preposition and Kofian permition are subjected to some restrictions.

The consequences of this grammatical disagreement are differences in some jurisprudence rules.

The researcher supports the Kofian opinion, for there are many evidences especially in Holly Quran.