التناص في أشكال الخزف السلجوقي

Abstract EN

The intertextuality represents Monetary concept by which visual texts can be read, because it contains in one way or another echo of other texts by considering it as a tool for understanding the visual style of the text ceramic through visual texts and dismantling them and canceling separated boundaries between forms in multiple periods until the shapes melt in ancient texts to open up to the religious, mythological, and historical prospects making Decorative texts of the Seljuk epoch meeting place for more than one time and more than one event and indication.

Here is the current study was an attempt to read texts of Islamic porcelain in Seljuk epoch Through intertextuality as a monetary tool contributes to the analysis of the artistic impact.

This is studied by the researchers through the four chapters.

The first chapter illustrates the problem of research and its importance and the need for it, as well as the goal of research ( decrease definition in Seljuk porcelain scenes).

Chapter one included limits search temporal and spatial and topical and identify idiomatic and procedural definitions.

The second chapter includes a theoretical framework, which included two sections: the first worked on the decrease between the concept and mechanisms of engaging.

The second chapter introduces the features of a decrease in Islamic art.

The third chapter allocated to display the search procedures if researchers stood up in front of the search community and the sample is chosen in deliberate manner dependent descriptive analytical approach in analysis of research sample , while the fourth chapter dealt with the search results such as: in Seljuk porcelain, building visual texts depend on the mechanism of indicative quotes from a variety of texts.

Seljuk potter uses in his texts on ceramic taking Anziahi trends away from cloning because the text Emulator for another text does not lead the meaning that performed by simulated text tool.

This is revealed by the research sample.

The most important conclusions was: 1.

The art texts are not a final Closed idea, template, or form.

It brings with it the vision and depositions prior to or simultaneous texts perceived by the varying levels and in many forms and formats are not difficult to understand and cognition from a listener.

2.

Maybe Intertextuality comes in form consciously that we believe that the dominant porcelain Seljuk and texts, especially with respect to the external intertextuality.

It has come unconsciously (Not my purpose), this what we think it was dominant on the internal intertextuality of texts.

The list of references followed the recommendations