إشكالية مصطلح الخطاب في الدراسات النقدية

Author

فضالة، إبراهيم

Source

مجلة الحكمة للدراسات الأدبية و اللغوية

Issue

Vol. 2018, Issue 16 (31 Dec. 2018), pp.228-242, 15 p.

Publisher

Kounouz Al Hekma

Publication Date

2018-12-31

Country of Publication

Algeria

No. of Pages

15

Main Subjects

Arabic language and Literature

Abstract EN

It is almos taken for granted that there is no consensus about the exact definition of the term discourse in critcal studies and this due to number of subjects that this concept deals with on the one hand, and the different background from which the researchers com from on the other Hence , it has become incumbent among critics to clarify the meaning of this term while taking into account the fact that the Westerners and some of the Arab critics had taught this concept and therefore had contributed to make such concepts central to the modern Arab literary studies.

In order to explore this concept, this research brings to the fore the following points: the difinition of discourse, novelistic discours, discours for the formalists, and last but not least the difference between discourse and text

American Psychological Association (APA)

فضالة، إبراهيم. 2018. إشكالية مصطلح الخطاب في الدراسات النقدية. مجلة الحكمة للدراسات الأدبية و اللغوية،مج. 2018، ع. 16، ص ص. 228-242.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-883995

Modern Language Association (MLA)

فضالة، إبراهيم. إشكالية مصطلح الخطاب في الدراسات النقدية. مجلة الحكمة للدراسات الأدبية و اللغوية ع. 16 (تموز / كانون الأول 2018)، ص ص. 228-242.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-883995

American Medical Association (AMA)

فضالة، إبراهيم. إشكالية مصطلح الخطاب في الدراسات النقدية. مجلة الحكمة للدراسات الأدبية و اللغوية. 2018. مج. 2018، ع. 16، ص ص. 228-242.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-883995

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

يتضمن هوامش : ص. 240-242

Record ID

BIM-883995