الفساد السياسي و الحكامة : القيمة النظرية و الخلفية الإيديولوجية

Abstract EN

This paper attempt to treating the theoretical aspect governance concept, and its relations political corruption, and throughout of procedural concepts and indicators of good Governance and corruption, this uncovers ideological background of governance discourse within the literature of post-development school and display the debates between third world perception based on dependence approach, and its terms: asymmetric exchange, subordination and deepen underdevelopment.

and the counter-critics relaying on intellectual and methodological foundations of liberalism multiple versions.

As a result to the growing criticism of the developmental perspective, by different theoretical orientations and approaches like: new institutionalism, Marxism, new Marxism new, dependence theory, and Gramcian domination theory.

Through the dismantling of political discourse on the subject of underdevelopment and development, the perspective of good governance severe seem to stick proverb political corruption as a variable key explanation for the reality of underdevelopment and the nature of governance with limited results developmentally to try to interpret the stalled development in underdeveloped countries.

The alternative is an integrative perspective that combines governance perspective with the new theories of political economy.