مشروع الدكتور البهبودي في تهذيب الحديث عند الإمامية : مراجعة نقدية

Abstract EN

1- The project focused Althveba Dr.

Albahbuda on basic modern sources at the front of the four booksWhat concerns us in the experience is what put the theory to refine talking apply if true at all modern books were among his theory through his knowledge of modern and applied in his other true Kefy .

2-The basis of his theory is that the way modern scholars of Sheikh Tusi time to this day is how vulnerable can be easily penetrated by lurking, which generates skepticism in Almruyat that are not available on the terms forefathers in the novel, Limited to hearing and reading the direct handling of the futility of the way into the latecomers Jamaluddin bin peacock (died 673 AH) to our present classification talk to the true and good and documented and weak and ineffective in the face of fraud and forgery.

3-That explained the weaknesses of this project is to entrust a decision on the safety of modern Sagmh to men wound of view and the amendment in the body of the modern (not in Sindh as is natural in it) and therefore judged weak simply because violating the knowledge bases which opens the door to much difference in the most heinous of which the image of that to open the door to determine how to talk with no more dangerous than tucking unrestricted restrictions all men wound and the amendment restrictions.

4-This project omits perhaps in good faith wisdom in the modern novel, and the use of scientists with him, knowing what is involved in the likelihood of non-conformity of fact which ensure this research Pthalith scientific and practical and economic life is based on taking the probability likely not neglect the scientific and practical data for the mere possibility of violation of reality.

5- The fact that Albahbuda academic specialist in modern science was not enough to move from specification phase to phase calendar and sentencing therefore tools and introductions when hardworking Albahbuda is not available even to the little ones for not being Albahbuda Hozhoya so they noticed it Bodh it happened in the confusion of which has not been proven Sindh and between Thread or Almdjaol where according Albahbuda that every novel is incorrect Mdjaolh and placed the difference is clear when hardworking between the subject and the weak Weak reality, however, corresponds to not be the subject was contrary to the right shall Mdjaola this plus to the presence of correct methods of other books is not sufficient to news that their weakness, how it may be considered theme just because the board did not like him or that corroboration in this book was not fully looked.