ذاتية العقد الممتد : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

The criteria on which the traditional jurisprudence is based to determine the What is considered are different according to the term used by the jurisprudence to describe the contract for which the time has an effect.

The difference of jurisprudence did not stop at the difference in naming this kind of contracts, The contract is a time contract or not, to the extent that a contract of one nature is a contract of immediate from the point of view of a particular jurisprudence.

It is at the same time, in the same nature and features, a contract in which time plays an important role, as is jurisprudence when it is divided into decades and decades.

Time in these decades was not accurate In the statement of the impact of time on this decade, as counting part of the contracts implementation of the original decades and time was considered a fundamental element in them at the same time neglect any impact of time in contracts can not be overlooked the impact of time and not give it any importance for the duration of the implementation of these contracts, despite These contracts would not have been fully implemented had it not been for this period of time.

Therefore, the research sought to demonstrate the extent to which the extended contract was unique and to attempt to clarify this identity by examining the criteria used in determining the time contracts and the usefulness of using these criteria And what they have achieved Resume of important results.