مذهب الأدارسة بالمغرب بين التشيع و التسنن و الاعتزال

Abstract EN

The study focuses on The Idrisidis Dynasty (al-Adarisah) doctrine in Maghreb,which all the other doctrines had disputed about.

The scholars and researchers sometimes relate it to the Shiite organism, sometimes to the Sunni and others to Al-Mu'tazila.

We tried to highlight the most important bases on which each team relied.

In the context of the Shi'a doctrine, we discussed the entrance of the Zaydi Shi'ism into the Maghreb.

This is reflected in the image of the personalities who had come to the Maghreb to spread the Zaydi Shi'ism.

Then we referred to the evidence that was adopted to confirm the Shi'ism of Al-Adarissa, comes first,the journey of Imam Idris I from the east to the Maghreb, the help he had got by Bani Abbas workers, who were considered as Shiites and the Shi'ism speeches and letters that supporters of Shi'ismdepended on.

In the second element we dealt with The Adarissah in the context of the Sunni doctrine, and the most important texts and evidence on which the Sunni supporters of the doctrine of Adarissah took into consideration.

First of them was the speech delivered by Idriss I before the Berbers, on the occasion he declared the establishment of his state in which he calls to follow the book of God and the Sunnah of His Messenger,he also praised the Maliki doctrine plus the appointment of a Maliki's jurist as the head of the judiciary system.

Nevertheless, the Sunni supporters of the doctrine of Adarissah depended on the Sunni composition of the population that formed the capital of Al-Adarissah.

The third and final element deals with Al-Adarissah in the context of the doctrine of Mu'tazilah.

The proponents of this idea rely on the story of Zaid ibn Ali's who had studied at the hands of the founder of Al-Mu'azilah doctrine .

They believed that the Zaidi and Al-Mu'azilah have been merged.

Then we dealt with sources that talked about how the doctrine of Mu'tazilah entered to the Maghreb which most of them were books of geography claiming that some of the tribes of Morocco obtained completely the doctrine of Al-Mu'tazila and persuaded the king Idris to convert it.

In the end, we explained that relating Al-Adarissah to a doctrine can only be by strong evidence so that we can separate between the contestants.

Then, we concluded that the dispute over the truth of Al-Adarissah doctrine was set by special considerations related to the Alaoui's origins of the founders of the state, which was a sufficient reason to gain Moroccans support.

In addition to the conditions experienced by the territory that embraced this state, where it was fertile ground for various sects, teams and doctrines.