مخالفات الإمام ابن الحاجب للإمام الآمدي في الإجماع من خلال كتابه منتهى السول : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

The epilogue After I finished this research I would like to summarize the main :findings First: Imam Ibn short brow book provisions of assets provisions for Professor Imam Al-Amidi finished book access and hope my .knowledge assets and controversy Second: Imam Ibn brow in his very arrival proved that he did not transfer forward follows Amidi distributorship even in too many fundamentalist issues order which we ate part of it and is about .consensus III: bucking the Ibn brow front Amidi in four issues of consensus :only as follows 1.bucking the question (if he violates some unanimity is unanimity)? Imam Ibn brow that unanimity but argument and went forward Amidi that unanimity and probably it is not unanimity and no .argument this went public 2.bucking in matter (consensus of city people) went ahead the brow's son clings argument Imam Al-Amidi that unanimity is not arguing and probably not unanimity on the pretext that telling the .public 3.bucking the question (do you agree badalakhtlav in the same era have consensus and argument) went to brow's son familiar argument consensus Imam Al-Amidi that unanimity probably that consensus .and argument in the era of the sahaabah and taabi'een 4.bucking in matter (if the second era AHL one tell the first era having settled their disagreement is unanimity argument) went ahead I'm eyebrow that argument and not unanimity Imam Al- .Amidi that unanimity and no more correct argument is unanimity IV: there are many issues where bucking Ibn brow forward Amidi in various sections of the jurisprudence recommend addressed in .master or doctoral dissertation Fifth: Imam Ibn brow is a hardworking because he broke up with Royal being scholars of maalikis and his views of the uniqueness of their fundamentalist audience addressed in independent research (matters bucking her son brow fundamentalist audience) under .publication