رسائل الإمام محمد الباقر-عليه السلام : دراسة فِي سلطة التعاضد النصي

Abstract EN

The messages at the Imam al-Baqir (p) and the media is outside the authority of the Umayyad control.

It penetrates a world of authorities and the world of reception that is outside the influence of politics, so that it can communicate with the private of its owners.

It is a means of bringing ideas closer, and responding to suspicions and appeals.

And to achieve a direct result of the answer to one of the mates of the mates, which is usually invented by the recipients (the public) in order to communicate with the imam of the need for knowledge, or to respond to the authorities and suppress and Kbtha means of dissemination of thought and knowledge, or out on the customary pattern to attract attention, Or order separates the mates N Imam The presence of the recipient is always formed by the written linguistic object, and shows the Imam is the speaker is the one authority in the text of the letter, Therefore, these messages represent the free thought of the distant Imam of the media exclusivity of illiterate sons.

Therefore, the messages are signs of communication in the thorny road, which shows the imam is the speaker without an audience.

The public is the speaker away from the direct with the imam.

(Control), v Imam ideas passed messages to the recipient / one and then with the collective The direct or indirect response of the public (direct / work on the application of all that is stated in the message, and the indirect intellectual and pilgrimage excitement that it raises among the recipients), is based on the aesthetics that make sense in the structure and context of the messages.

The meaning is free (not limited sense) restrictions of power, the purpose is to construct a theoretical perception of the general characteristics of the messages of Imam and eloquence of meaning in the overlapping formats of areas of the (sacred) only, and thus is an attempt to reveal the portability of the text on the formation and exit from the authority of self ) To effectiveness For we (the public), and thus represent a revelation to read the various cognitive structures and formations that have shaped the meaning leaked mediated by one recipient to the public, formed ostensibly meant is remained under the (authority commentator) we did not find detection This is an approach that aims to raise questions about the separation of the authorities (the authority of the shariah) and away from the intransigence of the public to rephrase the meaning according to the first form of the text, then the second form of the one recipient, then the third form the audience , The re-reading reveals the semantics and technologies that dominated the messages that served to communicate ideas with the encroachments involved in deconstructing the one recipient and the denial of what is in them, as well as the intensification that puts pressure on the individual and collective mind to avoid the authorities, As a result we need to reveal the overall meaning within the framework of the total messages after the detection of the letters and the significance of the messages produced within the framework of duplication of the inside and outside, and outside and inside.