جدل الصحراء و الغابة في ضوء التأويل التقابلي : دراسة تقابلية سيميائية
Other Title(s)
The desert-forest conflict in light of contrastive analysis : a contrastive semiotic study
Author
Source
مجلة جامعة الملك عبد العزيز : الآداب و العلوم الإنسانية
Issue
Vol. 28, Issue 2 (29 Feb. 2020), pp.125-157, 33 p.
Publisher
King Abdulaziz University Scientific Publishing Center
Publication Date
2020-02-29
Country of Publication
Saudi Arabia
No. of Pages
33
Main Subjects
Arabic language and Literature
Topics
Abstract EN
Research.
this study is based on the contrastive interpretation of two different settings; namely the desert and the forest.
It assumes that the difference between them has lead to a shift in how the world is perceived both on an intellectual and cultural level.
It has also lead to a shift in the tools of expression.
Contrastive interpretation has been applied here to a demonstrative element, namely the "nasba visible", since the desert is a setting laden with motifs.
The aforementioned interpretation eventually lead to different pathways that explained the difference between the two settings in question through which their effect on perspective, thought, and expression was examined.
The following notions were examined: setting and perspective, the essence of culture, the embodiment of civilization, the complexity of the text, loving poetry, and the maze of the novel.
From each one of these elements came a contrastive dualism that involved similes and metaphors, writing, symbolism and, finally, fate and destiny.
The methodology adopted in this study, contrastive interpretation, was first proposed by Dr.
Mohamed Bazi in a scientific project within the theoretical framework of the contrastive analysis theory in different books which have been referred to here.
I first started with an introduction and then went on to examine how human beings interact with the universe on three different levels.
This was a result of a contrastive analysis between the East and the West, culture and civilization which we believe are the most significant contrastive elements in this research.
This study made use of both contrastive analysis and semiotics, which were Al-Jahiz’s most important tools of rhetoric.
It is believed that it is an important secular and interpretive portal that allows us to examine and study interpretation, taking into consideration the fact that the entire universe is open for interpretation as well as different perspectives.
American Psychological Association (APA)
الصاعدي، سعود بن حامد مرزوق. 2020. جدل الصحراء و الغابة في ضوء التأويل التقابلي : دراسة تقابلية سيميائية. مجلة جامعة الملك عبد العزيز : الآداب و العلوم الإنسانية،مج. 28، ع. 2، ص ص. 125-157.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-931685
Modern Language Association (MLA)
الصاعدي، سعود بن حامد مرزوق. جدل الصحراء و الغابة في ضوء التأويل التقابلي : دراسة تقابلية سيميائية. مجلة جامعة الملك عبد العزيز : الآداب و العلوم الإنسانية مج. 28، ع. 2 (2020)، ص ص. 125-157.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-931685
American Medical Association (AMA)
الصاعدي، سعود بن حامد مرزوق. جدل الصحراء و الغابة في ضوء التأويل التقابلي : دراسة تقابلية سيميائية. مجلة جامعة الملك عبد العزيز : الآداب و العلوم الإنسانية. 2020. مج. 28، ع. 2، ص ص. 125-157.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-931685
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش.
Record ID
BIM-931685