أمالي علي عبد الرازق في علم البيان وتاريخه: في ميزان النقد والبلاغة

Abstract EN

This research starts with an introduction in which the researcher indicates the importance , the reasons , the motivations of this study, He indicates also the importance of previous studies and the most important difficulties he faces during the research.

The final form of the research consists of a biography of the author , preliminary studies, seven chapters and a conclusion.

The researcher mentions , the time and the place and the reasons for writing this study in the introduction and preliminary questions.

Besides, he discusses the necessary attention, the preference of the honorable Arabic language, the care of the people and the emergence of its sciences.

As for Chapter One , the researcher indicates the most important views of semanticists in the Qur'an eloquence and the role of the question of eloquence in forming Arabic eloquence and the linguists' efforts in this field.

As for chapter two, He defines Arabic semantics and rhetoric and then mentioned the most important views in the areas of good speech.

Next, he indicates the method of Abdulqahir Aljirjani and ASSakaaki in the study of rhetoric.

As for chapter three, he mentioned the studies of simile , metaphor, and metonymy.

Next, he discusses the methods of linguists in restricting the studies of the rhetoric.

Chapter four deals with the definition of simile, its advantages, and the most important sections.

Chapter five is divided between the concept of truth and simile, and their sections, and the most important relations of the metaphor transmitted.

Chapter Six deals with the definition of metaphor and its most important sections.

In chapter seven , he explained the meaning of metonymy, and the difference between it and metaphor, and then he discusses the most important sections.

This study supports the author with regard to his introduction and introductory talks, and those seven chapters of explanation and criticism .

Finally, the researcher writes a conclusion in which shows what is for and against him.

The study is followed by a bibliography which the researcher benefited from in this research.