الصداقة: بين أرسطو والغزالي: موافقات ومفارقات

Abstract EN

This research aims to address the friendship issue between Aristotle and Abu Hamid al Ghazali and compare their visions to reveal the aspects of originality and imitation in this matter.

The study concluded that there is an agreement between them on matters and differences in others.

The two agreed on the importance of friendship to the individual in terms of his need for consultation and cooperation with other friends.

He also showed that Hamed al Ghazali was influenced by Aristotle in his classification of friendship, Ghazali b (the love of utility), while the difference between them was evident in the choice of the name of the relationship, where Aristotle chose to express (friendship), and chose Ghazali expression (accompanied) followed by what was stated in the quran and Sunnah.

The difference between Aristotle and al Ghazali is also evident in their definition of what friendship is.

Al Ghazali was realistic in his definition of the society as being connected, neighboring and neighboring.

Their view of the conditions of friendship was similar, but Aristotle's view of the conditions of friendship was rational, but it was not realistic in certain conditions, especially the condition of equality and equality between friends in wealth and social status, while the conditions of companionship at al Ghazali were realistic Al Ghazali is the only one who has established the rights of companionship, which includes eight rights derived from the Quran and Sunnah and the effects of the righteous salaf, which added to his vision a spiritual tendency characterized by originality and seriousness.