![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
في مفهومي التعدي و اللزوم : تأملات نظرية حول مسألة خلافية بين النحويين البصريين و الكوفيين
Other Title(s)
On the concepts of transitivity and intranstivity : theoretical reflexions qbout a contoversial issue opposing the Basrane an Kufan grammarians
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 7, Issue 1 (31 Dec. 1997), pp.37-54, 18 p.
Publisher
Centre de Recherche Scientifique et Technique pour le Développement de la Langue Arabe
Publication Date
1997-12-31
Country of Publication
Algeria
No. of Pages
18
Main Subjects
Arabic language and Literature
Abstract EN
Al- ANBAARIY's report, in "AL-INSAAF", concerning the position of the Kufan grammarians as to why the first radical -W- is deleted in the nonderived verbs of the "fadila" class, is very perplexing indeed: According to the Kufans, these verbs are subject to deletion bacause they are "mutasiddiy", that is, in the usual terminology, "transitive”, and the "fadila" classe is "laazim”, that is "intransitive", and thus fails to meet the required conditions for deletion.
Now, one can easily find verbs of the first class which do not accept "direct objects’’ and verbs of the second class which do.
i'But unless one accepts the very unlikely hypothes is that the Kufanj grammarians were grossly ignorant, one has to suppose that they attached to the word "laazim", used to qualify the "fadila" class, a maening other than the B as ran one wich has become "standard".
Is there a reasonable and possibly intersting meaning of the word "laazim" wich can be significantly associated with the "fadila" class of verbs? that is the question this paper tries to answer.
Abstract FRE
La thèse des grammairiens Koufiens sur les causes du schème/ W/t sa dala "Fasala" telle qu'elle nous est rapportée par AL-ANBAARIY dans "AL-INSAAF" laisse perplexe:pour eux en effet, ces verbes subissent l'effacement en tant quet verbe "mutacaddiy", c'est-à-dire, dans la terminologie reçue, "transitifs", les verbes à schème "Fasila" ne le subissant pas en tant que verbes "laazim" c'est-à-dire, "intransitifs".
Or on peut aisément exhiber des verbes delà première catégorie qui n'acceptent pa de "complément d'objet direct" et des verbes de la seconde qui en acceptent.
Mais à moins de se contenter de l'hypothèse peu vraisenblable que les grammairiens Koufiens étaient d'une grossière ignorance, il faut supposer qu'ils donnaient au terme "Laazim" dont ils se servaient pour caractriser la classe "Fadila" une autre acception que celle, devenue "normale", des Basriens....
Y a-t-il une acception raisonnable (voire intéressante) de ce terme que l'on puisse associer significativement à la classe des verbes de schéma "Fadila"? c'est la question qu'explore cet article.
American Psychological Association (APA)
كلغلي، جمال الدين. 1997. في مفهومي التعدي و اللزوم : تأملات نظرية حول مسألة خلافية بين النحويين البصريين و الكوفيين. اللسانيات،مج. 7، ع. 1، ص ص. 37-54.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-950746
Modern Language Association (MLA)
كلغلي، جمال الدين. في مفهومي التعدي و اللزوم : تأملات نظرية حول مسألة خلافية بين النحويين البصريين و الكوفيين. اللسانيات مج. 7، ع. 1 (1997)، ص ص. 37-54.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-950746
American Medical Association (AMA)
كلغلي، جمال الدين. في مفهومي التعدي و اللزوم : تأملات نظرية حول مسألة خلافية بين النحويين البصريين و الكوفيين. اللسانيات. 1997. مج. 7، ع. 1، ص ص. 37-54.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-950746
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش : ص. 50-51
Record ID
BIM-950746