الاستصحاب و أثره في الأحكام الفقهية
Other Title(s)
Coincidence and its effect on jurisprudence
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 2015, Issue 3 (30 Jun. 2015), pp.245-274, 30 p.
Publisher
Al-Qalam University for Humanities and Applied Sciences
Publication Date
2015-06-30
Country of Publication
Yemen
No. of Pages
30
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Coincidence is one disputed piece of evidence for the authoritative work conducted by Islamic scholars, but the probable opinion is that the majority of Islamic scholars consider it an authoritative work.
However, Coincidence is crucial only when there is a need for inference and when there is no obvious text on a particular matter/topic that needs to be researched for a jurisprudential judgment.
Therefore, The researcher has pinpointed in this research some of the jurisprudential applications which are based on the difference between Islamic scholars on this concept, in addition to the fact that Coincidence has its important jurisprudential principles.
Undoubtedly, investigating this topic empirically reveals the extent to which the sub-judgments are connected to their foundations.
The researcher also pinpoints the approach of great Imams and how they base their jurisprudential judgments on such principles in the Fatwas issued from and about them
American Psychological Association (APA)
صلاح، كامل صبحي كامل. 2015. الاستصحاب و أثره في الأحكام الفقهية. مجلة القلم،مج. 2015، ع. 3، ص ص. 245-274.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-959440
Modern Language Association (MLA)
صلاح، كامل صبحي كامل. الاستصحاب و أثره في الأحكام الفقهية. مجلة القلم ع. 3 (كانون الثاني / حزيران 2015)، ص ص. 245-274.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-959440
American Medical Association (AMA)
صلاح، كامل صبحي كامل. الاستصحاب و أثره في الأحكام الفقهية. مجلة القلم. 2015. مج. 2015، ع. 3، ص ص. 245-274.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-959440
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش : ص. 264-270
Record ID
BIM-959440