الاستصحاب و أثره في الأحكام الفقهية

Abstract EN

Coincidence is one disputed piece of evidence for the authoritative work conducted by Islamic scholars, but the probable opinion is that the majority of Islamic scholars consider it an authoritative work.

However, Coincidence is crucial only when there is a need for inference and when there is no obvious text on a particular matter/topic that needs to be researched for a jurisprudential judgment.

Therefore, The researcher has pinpointed in this research some of the jurisprudential applications which are based on the difference between Islamic scholars on this concept, in addition to the fact that Coincidence has its important jurisprudential principles.

Undoubtedly, investigating this topic empirically reveals the extent to which the sub-judgments are connected to their foundations.

The researcher also pinpoints the approach of great Imams and how they base their jurisprudential judgments on such principles in the Fatwas issued from and about them