الحجج شبه المنطقية في الخطاب القرآني الموجه لأهل الكتاب

Abstract EN

The interest in argumentation and their mechanisms to try convince the others is old.

The first hints is appearing since Aristotelian rhetoric.

This interest has revived by Chaime Perelman and I.OlbrechtsTyteca in their book about the Argumentation, is called «workbook in the Argumentation The new rhetoric » .

where they are presented in this book to the arguments of connection and separation.

Among the arguments that we find in the first part of the arguments: the quasi-logical arguments which is derived their persuasive power from thier Similarity to formal, logical and mathematical methods in the proof.

even though were similar to it, does not mean that they are, but must be investigated and a great effort in building their reasoning.

The Holy Quran is a book of guidance and argumentation in the First and foremost, where we find his discours and then the arguments that are included will vary from discourse to discourse according to the recipient.

The problem is: Do we find in the Qur'an these kinds of arguments (quasi-logical arguments)? And how was it used to coax the recipient to convince him? In this work we will try to extract these arguments from the Holy Quran according to the types in which the authors of the aforementioned book.