![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
نظرية المدرسة الأصولية و الإخبارية بين إفراط و تفريط المحدثين عند الأمامية
Other Title(s)
The theory of the fundamentalist and news school between the excessive and negligent modernity of the Imamia
Author
الحميري، رشيد عبد الحميد عبد الرضا
Source
Issue
Vol. 2020, Issue 62 (30 Jun. 2020), pp.12-41, 30 p.
Publisher
University of Baghdad College of Islamic Sciences
Publication Date
2020-06-30
Country of Publication
Iraq
No. of Pages
30
Main Subjects
Topics
Abstract EN
The conflict between the fundamentalist and news theory in the methodology that each of the two schools pursued with the Twelver Shi'a Imamiyyah in deriving the legal rulings from the sources of legislation, especially in the second source, which is the noble hadith and narration after the Holy Qur’an, which is the first source has gone through multiple and complex stages that led This struggle to excess, stress, exaggeration, negligence, neglect and indulgence by each of the two schools in dealing with the noble hadith and narration and in the manufacture of rules and laws and fundamentalist and juristic theories of the process of jurisprudential development of legal rulings where every school believed and proceeded from a vision and an idea secured by it according to its convictions that reached it from Understanding it to the legal evidence, so the hadith passed through three stages and roles, which are the era of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him and God, which he called the “campaign of the Qur’an” or “the Qur’ans” or “the companions of the Qur’an”, and then the stage after the era of the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, who was called The stage of the “Hadith campaign” or the “Hadith owners” and then the stage of establishing “the science of hadith” and the science of the “novel” of the two honorable people, and after this struggle that lasted for a century And between the two schools, which led to the news taking a hard-line and excessive stance towards the science of the principles of jurisprudence, which was not a reaction to the fundamentalists, who in turn took an inattentive, negligent and indifferent attitude towards the noble hadith and narration, but after this conflict, controversy, and debate became known to all the scholars of the two schools of the two teams that The origin of the conflict is verbally returned, and the basis upon which the two parties rely and are based on the modern and honorable texts is that this mentality is far from reality and weak and its theory and idea that it believed in have no scientific value.
After all this period of time that the conflict and discussion between the two parties took, things returned to their former times, and the process of accreditation and reliance on the noble hadith and narration, with the benefit of the rules, is proceeding with advanced and excellent steps and according to tight curricula.
For every school, a methodology was established and established according to ideas, visions and rules inspired by the legal evidence
American Psychological Association (APA)
الحميري، رشيد عبد الحميد عبد الرضا. 2020. نظرية المدرسة الأصولية و الإخبارية بين إفراط و تفريط المحدثين عند الأمامية. مجلة كلية العلوم الإسلامية،مج. 2020، ع. 62، ص ص. 12-41.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-970661
Modern Language Association (MLA)
الحميري، رشيد عبد الحميد عبد الرضا. نظرية المدرسة الأصولية و الإخبارية بين إفراط و تفريط المحدثين عند الأمامية. مجلة كلية العلوم الإسلامية ع. 62 (حزيران 2020)، ص ص. 12-41.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-970661
American Medical Association (AMA)
الحميري، رشيد عبد الحميد عبد الرضا. نظرية المدرسة الأصولية و الإخبارية بين إفراط و تفريط المحدثين عند الأمامية. مجلة كلية العلوم الإسلامية. 2020. مج. 2020، ع. 62، ص ص. 12-41.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-970661
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش : ص. 34-35
Record ID
BIM-970661