صور من الخطاب الحجاجي العربي المعاصر : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

It is taken for granted that each discourse is a complex sequence of pronouncements, which is intended to achieve interaction in the discursive process, and for its success, the matter requires a prominent presence of many of the mechanisms monitored for argumentation, so that each speech becomes a specific gender of argumentation, walking in its orbit and operating within its circle, forming Thus, argumentative speech is contested by many directions.

We spotted three of them - by way of representation but not limited to - so the beginning was with Taha Abdel-Rahman, where his speech was characterized by two principles: intent and objection.

A second trend took a linguistic trend with Abu Bakr Al-Azzawi, who linked argumentative discourse to language itself.

A third trend was considered a rhetorical and argumentative trend, represented by Muhammad Al-Omari, who considered persuasion as an urgent mechanism in every argumentative speech.

What combines these three trends is that each one of them seeks to develop a general perception about the discourse and its relationship to argumentation, so that these perceptions converge in one place pragmatics, despite their variation in the source.