الاستلزام الحواري المعمم في القرآن الكريم : دراسة تداولية في المنظور الغرايسي

Abstract EN

This research is concerned with the study of generalized conversational implicature in Grice in his article (Logic and Conversation) as an applied study in the Holy Qur’anic to show the pragmatic beneficial purposes expressed by the speaker in the Quran conversation indirectly by the three indefinite indications which are written by Grice in his theory in this implicature.

The research finds that all these aspects have intended implied intentions for the speaker; what we found in this qur’anic conversation of these intentions in the first: either exclamation, metaphor, assistance or informing.

In the second, inspiration or persuasion.

In the third, either the offense or the doubt and glorification.

This beneficial purpose is selected according to the strategy of the conversational text that match the three meanings which were written by Grice for (x) in his theory.

The research also finds that the difference between the linguistic study and pragmatic study in the indefinite is that the first shows (X) as indefinite and unidentified to the speaker, whereas the latter depends, in its explanation for the indefinite, according to what the addressee determines in the explanation of (X).