حكم الحديث الشاذ عند أبي عبد الله الحاكم و أبو يعلى الخليلي

Abstract EN

The aim of the research is to reach the destination of Al-Hakim and Al-Khalili with an anomaly due to the large number of people disagreeing about it, and its importanceThen the paper reviews the critics who passed judgment on narrations, or their definition of anomalous.

Then the position of Al-Hakim and al-Khalili of the abnormal induction, according to what was readily available.

Then he presented people's understanding of their words, then criticized, analyzed and discussed it.

It emerged from the research and its data that the ruler and Khalili are like other critics with regard to the ruling on anomalies, and that the anomaly is rewarded all, in which there is nothing acceptable to the ruler and Khalili nor other critics in the era of the novel