إبطال الرأي النحوي في ضوء منطلقات الحجاج و تقنياته

Abstract EN

The present study tackles refuting the grammatical opinion in light of reasons for argumentation and its techniques.

It aims at clarifying one of these reasons: al-'iftirâḍ.

It also aims at pinpointing the techniques of argumentation as represented in quasi-logical claims and other tools in grammatical discourse.

The study adopts a descriptive, analytical approach that relies on induction.

The conclusions reached include: Al-'iftirâḍ constituted a convincing argumentative reason in refuting grammatical opinions via including and testing all possible aspects.

Also, to refute a grammatical opinion, grammarians relied on a large number of quasi-argumentative claims that were influential in conviction.

The study also showed that the foundations of Arabic grammar represented argumentative techniques that established a new form of structures or were established on structures that had existed earlier.