الوصف المناسب و دوره في التعليل عند الأصوليين و تطبيقاته الفقهية

Abstract EN

its truth and types is originally a legal and fundamental issue which emanates from the scale of analogy and justification.

It could be traced within the general approaches of analogy.

It is also related to the approaches of proving the cause by means of deduction and discretion.

Accordingly، the suitable description is the core of difference in between scholars of fundamentals as they differed around specifying the concept and significance of description by considering its types.

The fundamentals agreed to divide the description into an appropriate description (respected by the Islamic jurisprudence) such as (the considered benefit as stated in the text)، the (considered benefit approved by consensus and (the considered benefit approved by priority).

Then there is the unconsidered description which is identified as “the invalid suitable”، “only invalid” and the “invalid benefit” which simply means the Islamic jurisprudence abolished it.

As for the types of suitable descriptions – because the Islamic jurisprudence considered description a weakness- they include four categories; influential، convenient، strange and loose and they are all controversial.

In conclusion، tracing suitability is itself “a moderate means” since it is carefully considered by the Islamic jurisprudence.

Justification is counted after; descriptions، weaknesses، reasoning، clues and the inflected benefits and interests that could be realized.

As for the abuses and ill effects، they should be kept away and prevented.

Hence، utilizing a suitable description becomes a favorable matter not defected one.